Unit 119, Thorp Arch Estate, LS23 7FL
Workshop and premises Decided 6 February 2023 CHG100216576 Wharfedale Property Management Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a workshop operator on Thorp Arch Estate, argued the rateable value should be reduced from £25,000 to £21,000, relying on the rent passed on the subject property in February 2017 (£19,000-£22,500 over 2.5 years, averaging £21,000). The Valuation Officer relied on comparables from the estate that had been significantly improved by landlords at tenant request. The tribunal found the VO's comparables were not truly comparable as they were of superior quality due to landlord improvements, while the subject property remained unmodernised since 1941 construction. Following Lotus and Delta, the tribunal placed most weight on the actual rent passing on the subject property and reduced the RV to £21,000, the average rent over the lease term.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AV Matrix Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Lamb v Go Outdoors Ltd
- Hearing
- 10 January 2023
Similar decisions
- UNIT 11, MANOR PARK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, WHITEHALL ROAD, DRIGHLINGTON, DRIGHLINGTON, BD11 1LW — Dismissed, 3 Apr 2025
- GARCROSS ENGINEERING, PEPPER ROAD, LS10 2RU — Dismissed, 9 Feb 2023
- 2, WORTLEY MOOR LANE, LS12 4JD — Dismissed, 10 Jan 2023
- UNITS 1-4, LEATHLEY ROAD INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, LEATHLEY ROAD, LS10 1BG — Dismissed, 25 Jul 2022
All decisions in Leeds City Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.