Boston Tea Party Group, 82-84 Vauxhall Street, PL4 0EX
Café/bar and premises Decided 8 March 2022 CHG100317784 Gordon Costello
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the property should be valued at £36,000 RV based on its lease rent of £45,000 pa (adjusted to £72/m²), contending that comparable evidence was unreliable and the property differed substantially from the Valuation Officer's primary comparable (90 Vauxhall Street). The tribunal found the Valuation Officer's rental evidence contained multiple anomalies and inconsistencies; accepted the appellant's analysis of the subject property's own rent as the most reliable evidence; and concluded the property, lacking waterfront location advantages and restricted by listed building status, warranted valuation at £36,000 RV based on rental evidence rather than the higher £79,500 RV to which the VO had reduced the original £90,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Boston Tea Party, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 11 February 2022
Similar decisions
- Unit 6 at 11, Bretonside, PL4 0FE — Allowed in part, 24 Apr 2025
- Seven Stars Inn, Seven Stars Lane, PL5 4NN — Dismissed, 5 Apr 2024
- Britannia Inn, 2 Wolseley Road, PL2 3BW — Allowed in part, 27 Feb 2024
- 95-99 Ridgeway, PL7 2AA — Allowed, 16 Jun 2021
All decisions in Plymouth City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.