Tribunals · South Tyneside Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT C, ROLLING MILL ROAD, VIKING INDUSTRIAL PARK, NE32 3DP

Warehouse and premises Decided 13 July 2022 CHG100401708 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£76,500£41/m²
Ratepayer sought£67,000
VO conceded first£75,000−2% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£75,000£41/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (UTS Engineering Ltd), represented by Altus Group, challenged the rateable value of a detached warehouse unit at Unit C, Rolling Mill Road, Viking Industrial Park, seeking a reduction from £76,500 to £67,000 based on a proposed rate of £36.50 per m². The Valuation Officer had reduced the assessment to £75,000 at £41.00 per m² during the challenge stage. The tribunal found that whilst the rent passing on the subject property provided a starting point, consideration of comparable rents and assessments on other similar units at Rolling Mill Road (particularly Unit D at £44.86 per m² and Unit 1 at £43.49 per m²) demonstrated that the current assessment at £41.00 per m² was reasonable and not excessive, and therefore dismissed the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was UTS Engineering Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
17 June 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in South Tyneside Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.