Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Durham County Council · 2017 rating list

Barton Townley Ltd, Hunwick Lane, Willington, Willington, DH15 0HY

Offices and premises Decided 24 May 2022 CHG100404077 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 26 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (BARTON TOWNLEY LTD, HUNWICK LANE, WILLINGTON, CROOK, CO DURHAM, DL15 0HY). Every property is listed below.

The 26 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Highlands House, Basingstoke Road, Spencers Wood, Reading RG7 1AE£145,000——Dismissed
9-10 CROSS STREET, PRESTON PR1 3LT———Dismissed
1ST FLOOR LHS RIVERSIDE STUDIOS, WHITEHALL WATERFRONT, 2 RIVERSIDE WAY, LEEDS, LS1 4EH———Dismissed
BST & GRD FLR 45, BEAK STREET, LONDON, W1F 9SD———Dismissed
ARCH 193, CARLISLE LANE, LONDON, SE1 7LH———Dismissed
M J WARNER, HARE STREET, BUNTINGFORD, HERTS, SG9 0EA———Dismissed
KIOSK 4, BEACONSFIELD SERVICES, WINDSOR ROAD, BEACONSFIELD, BUCKS, HP9 2SE———Dismissed
2ND FLR, NORFOLK HOUSE, SMALLBROOK QUEENSWAY, BIRMINGHAM, B5 4LJ———Dismissed
GRD FLR 11, PALMER STREET, LONDON, SW1H 0AD———Dismissed
BRIDGE HOTEL, NORTH ROAD, DURHAM, DH1 4SE———Dismissed
KINGHAMS SPICERS YARD, SOUTH END, CROYDON, CR0 1BF———Dismissed
DERRICK SERVICES LTD, SHUTTLEWORTH CLOSE, GREAT YARMOUTH, NORFOLK, NR31 0NQ———Dismissed
THE RED LION 63, HIGH STREET, SWANAGE, DORSET, BH19 2LY———Dismissed
8, THE PARADE, CHURCH STREET, ARMTHORPE, DONCASTER, SOUTH YORKSHIRE, DN3 3AG———Dismissed
BST & GRD FLR 29, CHARLOTTE ROAD, LONDON, EC2A 3PB———Dismissed
STALL NO 183-187, QUEENSGATE MARKET, PRINCESS ALEXANDRA WALK, HUDDERSFIELD, HD1 2RD———Dismissed
BARTON TOWNLEY LTD, HUNWICK LANE, WILLINGTON, CROOK, CO DURHAM, DL15 0HYThis appeal———Dismissed
MONTAGUS SANDWICH BAR, ROYAL VICTORIA PLACE, TUNBRIDGE WELLS, KENT, TN1 2SP———Dismissed
LITTLE GREEN RASCALS ORGANIC DAY NURSERY, SCHOOL LANE, BISHOPTHORPE, YORK, YO23 2RE———Dismissed
HAPPY HANDS DAY NURSERY, ST JAMES ROAD, NORTHAMPTON, NN5 5HU———Dismissed
UNIT 3 QUEENS COURT FLETCHERS WAY, FLETCHERS WAY, FOREST TOWN, MANSFIELD, NOTTS, NG19 0FN———Dismissed
EDITH ROSE DAY NURSERY, OXFORD ROAD, WINDSOR, BERKS, SL4 5DX———Dismissed
118, HIGH STREET, COLCHESTER, CO1 1SZ———Dismissed
UNIT 5, BROUGHTON CLOSE, READING, RG30 1DZ———Dismissed
UNITS 2 AND 3 BANK FARM, CALVELEY HALL LANE, CALVELEY, TARPORLEY, CHESHIRE, CW6 9LB———Dismissed
BUDGEN MOTORS, STAFFORD PARK 1, TELFORD, SHROPSHIRE, TF3 3BD———Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants claimed a 65% abatement was justified by material changes in circumstances resulting from COVID-19 restrictions, arguing that government measures and resulting physical manifestations in the locality (reduced pedestrian activity, "ghost town" conditions) warranted reduction. The tribunal held that section 1(4) of the Rating (Coronavirus) and Directors Disqualification (Dissolved Companies) Act 2021 prohibited consideration of any matter directly or indirectly attributable to coronavirus, and that the specific exceptions in section 1(5) did not apply to these cases. The appeals were dismissed as no reductions could be made to reflect the effects of COVID-19.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Vistra International Expansion Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
covid
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Clement v Addis Ltd; Chilton-Merryweather v Hunt; Pavlou (Valuation Officer); Financial Conduct Authority v Arch and others; John Burvill and Gareth David Jones (Valuation Officer); Kendrick (Valuation Officer)
Hearing
18 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Durham County Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.