Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · 2017 rating list

147, KINGS ROAD, SW3 5TX

Shop and Premises Decided 4 April 2023 CHG100411493 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£77,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£72,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (147 Kings Road, London, SW3 5TX). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
147 Kings Road, London, SW3 5TXThis appeal£77,500—£72,500Allowed in part
149 Kings Road, London, SW3 5TX£75,500—£70,500Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the rateable values of the two retail units at 147 and 149 Kings Road were excessive and should be reduced based on rental evidence. The tribunal considered competing rental evidence and comparable assessments within the same parade, finding that the established tone of value had not been settled. The tribunal determined that rental evidence provided the best basis for valuation, placing most weight on rent at 151 Kings Road agreed close to the AVD. The tribunal reduced the tone of value to £2,150 per m² ITZA, resulting in reductions of £5,000 and £5,000 respectively, allowing the appeals in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lucas Hugh Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, tone_of_list_comparables
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 March 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.