Woodlands Hotel, Woodlands Hotel And Pine Lodges, Meathop, Meathop, LA11 6RB
Guest house and premises with restaurant and bar Decided 3 February 2023 CHG100415076 John Houston Consulting
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the VO's rateable value of £48,250 for a guest house with restaurant/bar and eleven self-catering lodges, seeking £29,500. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, reducing the RV to £41,750. On the guest house element, the tribunal found the property's remote location warranted a lower price per double bed unit (£1,200 vs £1,400). For the self-catering lodges, the tribunal accepted the VO's Fair Maintainable Trade method at 13.5%. For the bar/restaurant, the tribunal adopted 5% of FMT rather than the VO's conflicting figures, finding this better reflected the income position.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Trading accounts, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 20 January 2023
Similar decisions
- The Pheasant Inn, Flookburgh Road, LA11 7RQ — Dismissed, 28 Nov 2022
- Holmescales Riding Centre, Old Hutton, LA8 0NB — Dismissed, 21 May 2022
- Punch Bowl Inn, Crosthwaite, LA8 8HR — Allowed in part, 16 May 2022
- The Rowan Tree Riverside Tea Garden and Restaurant, Stock Lane, Grasmere, Grasmere, LA22 9SJ — Dismissed, 27 Oct 2020
All decisions in South Lakeland District Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.