Unit 1, Superdrug Stores, B23 6RS
Shop and premises Decided 22 March 2023 CHG100426484 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value from £31,250 to £27,250 (reflecting a zone A rate of £250/m² instead of £275/m²) and to restore a 5% end allowance for shape that had been removed from the 2017 list. The tribunal found that the zone A rate of £275/m² was not excessive based on the rent passing on the subject property (£290.53/m² just 15 months before the valuation date) and a basket of comparable rents, and that the passing rent already factored in the property's shape, so no end allowance was warranted.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Superdrug Stores Plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Quantum or end allowance
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Ladies Hosiery and Underwear Ltd v West Middlesex Assessment Committee
- Hearing
- 6 March 2023
Similar decisions
- UNIT 10, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 6, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 2A, FORT SHOPPING PARK, FORT PARKWAY, FORT PARKWAY, B24 9FP — Allowed, 7 Jul 2026
- 39-40, CANNON STREET, B2 5EE — Dismissed, 29 Jan 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.