Tribunals · Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council · 2017 rating list

THE COMMERCIAL CENTRE, CLOWES STREET, CHADDERTON, CHADDERTON, OL9 7LY

Workshop and premises Decided 20 September 2022 CHG100429931 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£29,750£31.88/m²
Ratepayer sought£27,250
VO conceded first£29,500−1% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£27,250£29.23/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of a mixed-use workshop and office property, arguing that the tone prices applied to different aged sections were excessive and that the quality allowance for the 1980s building was insufficient. The tribunal accepted the appellant's rental and comparable assessment evidence, finding that unadjusted prices of £28/m² (1960s), £29/m² (1970s), and £35/m² (1980s) with a 7.5% quality allowance were fair and reasonable. The tribunal preferred this evidence over the Valuation Officer's reliance on a connected-party lease rent, reducing the assessment to £27,250 RV.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Rap Spiderweb Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
25 August 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.