Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Islington · 2017 rating list

2 ND FLR 53­54, ST JOHNS SQUARE, EC1V 4JL

Office and premises Decided 24 October 2022 CHG100530359 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£53,000
Ratepayer sought£42,500
VO conceded first£50,500−5% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£45,250from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (2nd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
1st Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL£53,000£42,500£45,250Allowed in part
2nd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JLThis appeal£53,000£42,500£45,250Allowed in part
3rd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL£55,500£44,250£47,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the Valuation Officer's allowances of 4.75%-5% for disturbance from adjacent major building works at 96-100 Clerkenwell Road, seeking an additional 15% allowance totalling 19.75%-20%. The tribunal found the existing allowances unreasonable given the severity and duration of works (over two years) affecting the subject properties, which shared a party wall with the development site. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part, applying a total 15% allowance, which it considered fairly reflected the disruption and was consistent with comparable cases in London.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Grimshaw Architects LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Building works or disturbance nearby · decisive
Change of circumstances
building redevelopment works
Evidence
Expert report, Photographs, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
7 October 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Islington · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.