BST-GND FLRS 173-175 CLEVELAND STREET, W1T 6QR
Office with basement and premises Decided 27 November 2024 CHG100547851 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that a 10% allowance should be applied to the ground floor office due to the lack of privacy from windows being level with street pavement, creating a "goldfish bowl effect". The Valuation Officer contended no allowance was justified because railings set the windows back from the pavement. The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that comparable hereditaments (14 George Street, 10 Lower Grosvenor Place, and 1 Chapel Place) with similar characteristics had 10% allowances applied, and concluded a 10% allowance was warranted for the subject property.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Shah Dodhia & Co, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 31 October 2024
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.