Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 1, The Old Sorting Office, BH1 1AX

Shop and premises Decided 19 December 2022 CHG100661436 Ameliorate Consultancy

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£34,250
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 7 Jun 2018

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 1, The Old Sorting Office, 5 Albert Road, Bournemouth BH1 1AX). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Unit 1, The Old Sorting Office, 5 Albert Road, Bournemouth BH1 1AXThis appeal£34,250——Allowed
Unit 2, The Old Sorting Office, 5 Albert Road, Bournemouth BH1 1AX£30,250——Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants contended that completion notices dated 31 May 2018 had not been validly served upon them, and that their properties should not have been entered into the rating list. The Tribunal found that the Billing Authority failed to demonstrate that the completion notices had been properly posted by recorded delivery, as their evidence (a mailing report extract) was insufficient to identify that the notices related to these specific properties or appellants, and lacked supporting documentation such as recorded delivery reference numbers or proof of handover to Royal Mail. The Tribunal allowed the appeals and ordered deletion of the properties from the 2017 Rating List.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Old Sorting Office (Bournemouth) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
UKI (Kingsway) Limited v Westminster City Council [2017] EWCA Civ 430; Delph Property Group Ltd v Alexander (Valuation Officer) and Leicester City Council
Hearing
30 November 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.