Maiden No 1737, Gable 94 Fairfield Street, M1 2WR

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the Valuation Officer's placement of an advertising board at location tier 2, position B. The appellant argued that the board should be placed in tier 4 position C due to its poor visibility, low position on the road, and location in a quieter non-urban area. The tribunal accepted the appellant's evidence based on photographs and mapping, finding that the property was more akin to a quieter route, and that the board's poor impact and short range display warranted tier 4 band C placement. The tribunal determined the RV of £425 aligned with rental evidence passing on the hereditament.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Primesight, represented.

Grounds argued

• Rental evidence
• Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
• Zoning or layout

Evidence

Rents, Photographs, Expert report

Cases cited

Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)

Hearing

14 February 2022

Similar decisions

• 80 Hertz Recording Studio, The Sharp Project, M40 5BJ — Allowed in part, 11 Jul 2025
• G M P T E BUS SHELTER (EB0125) OPP 107, Piccadilly, M1 2DB — Allowed in part, 13 Feb 2024
• 258-260 Deansgate, M3 4BG — Dismissed, 10 Jun 2021
• Clear Channel No 02036672 01-03 On Apollo Theatre, 1 Stockport Road, M12 6AP — Allowed in part, 11 May 2021

All decisions in Manchester City Council ·