Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

4 TH FLR AT 18, WELLS STREET, W1T 3PG

Offices and premises Decided 17 July 2023 CHG100682585 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—£617.5/m²
Ratepayer sought£37,000
VO conceded first£40,750
Tribunal decided£39,500from 16 Nov 2020

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that building works on an adjacent property warranted a 20% temporary allowance as at 30 March 2021 (the material day for the MCC), given the severity and duration of works and the close proximity and shared party wall. The Valuation Officer defended a 12% allowance, contending the building was protected and the size of the development mitigated impact. The tribunal found that 12% did not fully reflect the proximity and duration of the development works, but was not persuaded that 20% was justified. The panel increased the allowance to 15%, resulting in a revised RV of £39,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Todd Architects Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Change of circumstances
building works - major adjacent development
Evidence
Photographs, tone_of_list_comparables
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Denton v TH White Ltd
Hearing
28 June 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.