Countryside House, The Drive, CM13 3AT
Office building and premises Decided 13 September 2023 CHG100731610 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the appeal property should be valued at £170 psm (RV £580,000) based on comparable evidence from Canon House, which was valued at £175 psm despite being more modern. The tribunal found that the comparison was not like-for-like because Canon House's carparking had been separately assessed in 2017, whereas it was included in the subject property's RV. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant had not discharged the burden of proof that the RV of £615,000 was unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Countryside Properties UK Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 15 August 2023
Similar decisions
- GND 1ST & 2ND FLRS HIGHWAY HOUSE, KINGS ROAD, CM14 4DX — Allowed in part, 24 Oct 2025
- SUITE 1 2ND FLR KINGSGATE 1, KING EDWARD ROAD, CM14 4HL — Dismissed, 21 Aug 2025
All decisions in Brentwood Borough Council · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.