Tribunals · Brentwood Borough Council · 2017 rating list

Countryside House, The Drive, CM13 3AT

Office building and premises Decided 13 September 2023 CHG100731610 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£750,000£215/m²
Ratepayer sought£580,000
VO conceded first£615,000−18% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£615,000£180/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the appeal property should be valued at £170 psm (RV £580,000) based on comparable evidence from Canon House, which was valued at £175 psm despite being more modern. The tribunal found that the comparison was not like-for-like because Canon House's carparking had been separately assessed in 2017, whereas it was included in the subject property's RV. The tribunal dismissed the appeal as the appellant had not discharged the burden of proof that the RV of £615,000 was unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Countryside Properties UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
15 August 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Brentwood Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.