620 Chester Road, M16 0SF
Workshop and premises Decided 17 May 2024 CHG100745475 Avison Young (UK) Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the original RV of £174,000 was excessive and proposed £112,000, disputing the Valuation Officer's 72% uplift for showroom quality and alternative valuation as a tyre and exhaust centre at £85/m². The tribunal found the property was not in a sufficiently prominent location to warrant such a premium compared to comparable properties on the A56, and that its larger size (1,191m²) was inconsistent with typical tyre and exhaust centres. The tribunal accepted the industrial tone basis with a modest 10% uplift to reflect proximity to the A56, resulting in a revised RV of £120,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lancaster Plc, represented.
Grounds argued
- tone adopted per m2 · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Photographs, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 26 April 2024
Similar decisions
- SAICA PAPER (UK) LTD 144, MANCHESTER ROAD, PARTINGTON, M31 4QN — Dismissed, 11 Mar 2026
- SHED1, MANCHESTER INT FREIGHT TERMINAL, WESTINGHOUSE ROAD, TRAFFORD PARK, TRAFFORD PARK, M17 1DP — Dismissed, 17 Sept 2025
- SHED 5, MANCHESTER INT FREIGHT TERMINAL, WESTINGHOUSE ROAD, TRAFFORD PARK, TRAFFORD PARK, M17 1DP — Dismissed, 9 Jan 2025
- 620 Chester Road, M16 0SF — Allowed in part, 17 May 2024
All decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.