1 ST FL 110, OLD BROMPTON ROAD, SW7 3RA
Offices and Premises Decided 28 October 2024 CHG100752142 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant company challenged the rateable values of three office hereditaments at 110 Old Brompton Road, London, arguing the assessed values were excessive and proposing a uniform rate of £400 per m². The Tribunal accepted that comparable rental evidence and settled assessments of similar Grade 2 listed office buildings in the locality supported a lower valuation, whilst noting the subject building's more prominent location. The Tribunal determined an unadjusted rate of £425 per m² was reasonable, allowing the appeals in part with reductions from the original assessments.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was SRO Motorsports Europe Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson; Denton v TH White Ltd
- Hearing
- 7 October 2024
Similar decisions
- 4TH FLR 1, BREAKERS PLACE, W11 4EX — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2026
- 45, HARRINGTON GARDENS, SW7 4JU — Allowed in part, 29 Sept 2025
- BST & PT GRD FLR 1 NICHOLAS ROAD, W11 4AN — Dismissed, 16 May 2025
- UNIT 301 GRAND UNION STUDIOS, 332 LADBROKE GROVE, W10 5AD — Allowed in part, 8 Jan 2025
All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.