Second Floor Room A2.21, 13 Cavendish Square, W1G 0AN
Office and premises Decided 3 April 2024 CHG100757653 Rupert David Ltd
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the base rate per m² of £525 was excessive and should be reduced to £475. The tribunal found that the existing RV of £21,250 (based on £525 per m²) was not unreasonable. The tribunal gave greatest weight to Miss Leung's rental evidence from new lettings around the April 2015 antecedent valuation date, including properties at Manchester Square and Queen Anne Street with comparable pricing at or above £525 per m², and found the appellant had not provided substantiated evidence to demonstrate the current assessment was unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Private Healthcare Information Network Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 18 March 2024
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.