Tribunals · Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council · 2017 rating list

DIGITAL AD RT BRIDGEWATER CIRCLE APPROACH TO M60 NR TRAFFORD CENTRE, TRAFFORD BOULEVARD, Urmston, Urmston, M41 7JN

Digital advertising right and premises Decided 2 August 2024 CHG100764775 Montagu Evans - Richard Wackett

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£52,000
Ratepayer sought£31,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£37,000from 21 Nov 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (Peel Advertising Ltd) challenged the rateable values of three digital advertising rights at locations near Trafford Centre, arguing they were overvalued. The tribunal examined rental evidence showing base rents of £30,000-£60,000, the agreed comparable of JC Decaux at £25,000 per 96-sheet face, and other comparable assessments at £40,000-£50,000. Finding inconsistency in the Valuation Officer's approach and insufficient justification for the different valuations adopted, the tribunal adopted a base unit value of £35,000 per display, resulting in reductions to £37,000 for hereditaments 1-2 and £72,500 for hereditament 3.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Peel Advertising Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Hearing
25 July 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.