insta House, Ivanhoe Road, Finchampstead, RG40 4QQ
Warehouse and premises Decided 8 September 2023 CHG100773309 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a company, challenged the rateable value on the grounds of material change in circumstances, claiming that construction of the Nine Mile Ride extension warranted a 10% temporary allowance (reducing RV to £90,000), compared to the Valuation Officer's 5% allowance (RV £95,000). The tribunal found that at the material day (25 November 2021), only a road diversion remained outstanding, access to the estate was maintained throughout, and no evidence demonstrated trade impact. The tribunal concluded the 5% allowance was reasonable and dismissed the appeal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Insta Group Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Change of circumstances · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- road construction - Nine Mile Ride extension
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
- Hearing
- 15 August 2023
Similar decisions
- Units 1 & 2 Rowanwood & 12, Ivanhoe Road, Hogwood Lane Industrial Estate, RG40 4QQ — Dismissed, 8 Sept 2023
- Units 4-5, Rowanwood, Ivanhoe Road, Finchampsted, RG40 4QQ — Dismissed, 8 Sept 2023
- Unit 8, Ivanhoe Road, Hogwood Lane Industrial Estate, Finchampstead, RG40 4QQ — Dismissed, 8 Sept 2023
- UNIT 2 TOUTLEY WORKS, TOUTLEY ROAD, RG41 1QN — Dismissed, 17 May 2023
All decisions in Wokingham Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.