1 Slater Court, Harrier Way, PE7 3SE
Warehouse and premises Decided 15 August 2023 CHG100777112 Richard Dumare
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a split assessment of the property into office space (£4,500) and warehouse space (£8,000), claiming two independently registered businesses occupied separate units with their own entrances and facilities. The tribunal examined the four ingredients of rateable occupation established in John Laing and found that QNP Toys Ltd lacked exclusive occupation of the ground floor, as the head lease granted Quality & Price Ltd paramount occupation of the whole premises with no subletting rights. Following the principles in Cardtronics and Libra Textiles, the tribunal determined that the arrangement constituted a lodging-style relationship rather than two separate hereditaments, and the property should remain as a single assessment at £16,250.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Quality & Price Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Split or merge the assessment
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- John Laing and Son Ltd v Kingswood Assessment Committee and others (1949); Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes 2020 UKSC 21; Holywell Union v Halkyn District Mines (1895) AC 117; Libra Textiles (Boundary Mills) v Roberts (VO) 2020 UKUT 0237; Woolway (VO) v Mazars (2015); Westminster Council v Southern Railway Co [1936] AC 511
- Hearing
- 19 July 2023
Similar decisions
- 35, ST PETERS ROAD,, PE29 7DA — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- 35, ST PETERS ROAD,, PE29 7DA — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- HERCULES HOUSE, PIERSON ROAD, ENTERPRISE CAMPUS, ALCONBURY WEALD, ALCONBURY WEALD, PE28 4YA — Dismissed, 11 Sept 2025
- 13, Glebe Road, PE29 7DX — Dismissed, 22 Oct 2024
All decisions in Huntingdonshire District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.