Carousel, 147-157 Promenade, FY1 5BE
Amusement Arcade and Premises Decided 26 May 2023 CHG100796010 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the base rate of £115 per m² was excessive and should be reduced to £100 per m² to match the comparable property at 125-141 Promenade, which was located next door. The appellant contended that the tone was set by location with no quantum allowances within the scheme. The tribunal found that the comparable property's lower base rate of £100 per m² was justified by quantum allowances reflecting the property's larger size, and that the appellant had not proven the subject property's rate was excessive when compared to the rental figures of other comparable properties. The appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Silcock Leisure Group Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Hearing
- 12 May 2023
Similar decisions
- Silcocks Leisure Group, 125-141 Promenade, FY1 5BE — Dismissed, 19 Nov 2021
- 147-157 Promenade, FY1 5BE — Dismissed, 19 Nov 2021
- 250 Queens Promenade, FY2 9HA — Allowed in part, 17 Dec 2020
All decisions in Blackpool Borough Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.