Tribunals · Rugby Borough Council · 2017 rating list

43-44 Clocktowers SC, CV21 2JR

Shop and Premises Decided 20 November 2023 CHG100796128 Lambert Smith Hampton - D Bullimore

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£44,750£450/m²
Ratepayer sought£24,750
VO conceded first£43,500−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£43,500£450/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction of the rateable value from £43,500 (the Valuation Officer's revised figure) to £24,750, arguing that the zone A rate of £450/m² was excessive based on the subject property's rent of £15,000 pa and comparable rents. The tribunal found that the respondent's comparable properties, agreed within 12 months of the antecedent valuation date with devalued rents ranging from £462-£545/m², provided more reliable evidence than the appellant's comparables, which were either too remote from the valuation date or required significant adjustments. The panel concluded that the zone A rate of £450/m² was supported by rental evidence and fair and reasonable, dismissing the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Works, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
6 November 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in Rugby Borough Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.