PT 4TH FLR EAST (EXCL MEETING ROOMS) & 5TH FLR, PROSPECT HOUSE, 80 - 110, NEW OXFORD STREET, 80 - 110, NEW OXFORD STREET, WC1A 1HB
Offices and premises Decided 2 April 2024 CHG100797130 Cushman & Wakefield - Richard Proctor
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £1,200,000 RV (at £600/m²) to £1,160,000 RV (at £575/m²) based on tonal consistency with other properties within the same building. The Valuation Officer defended the £600/m² base rate using rental evidence from comparable properties with new lettings around the antecedent valuation date of 1 April 2015. The tribunal found that the rental evidence of new lettings from 6th floor properties analysed at £608.40 and £623.41 per m² supported the £600/m² valuation, while the appellant's tonal evidence from other unresolved properties within the building carried less weight. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding insufficient substantiated evidence to demonstrate the current assessment was unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was WME, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, tone_of_list_comparables
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 18 March 2024
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.