4 TH FLR, 55, ST JAMES'S STREET, SW1A 1LA
Office and Premises Decided 3 February 2025 CHG100817180 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 7 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of seven office units at 55 St James Street, proposing a reduction in the rate per m² from £1,100 to £1,000. The tribunal examined rental evidence for the subject properties and comparable offices on St James Street, finding that the rents agreed for the subject building (particularly the 4th Floor at £1,146.55/m² and 3rd Floor at £1,166.33/m²) supported the assessment. The tribunal concluded that the subject building was unique as a new bespoke modern Grade A office development with no comparable period buildings, and the rental evidence from the subject building itself carried more weight than settlement evidence from older refurbished buildings. The appeal was dismissed and the RV of £1,100/m² was found reasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AlbaCore Capital LLP, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 10 January 2025
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.