Tribunals · Newcastle City Council · 2017 rating list

45-51 Clayton Street & 42 Newgate Street, NE1 5PW

Restaurant and premises Decided 30 October 2024 CHG100822536 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£121,000
Ratepayer sought£77,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£77,000£210/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the property should be described as a restaurant and premises rather than a shop, and valued using the overall basis method rather than zoning, based on significant structural works undertaken including installation of customer toilets, kitchen, cold stores, and 130 covers. The tribunal found the property had undergone material works changing its mode of category, and that the majority of comparable restaurants in Newcastle were valued on the overall basis at approximately £210 per m². The tribunal allowed the appeal and confirmed the rateable value at £77,000 effective from 5 April 2019.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was BKUK Group Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Zoning or layout
  • Valuation method · decisive
Evidence
Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Glasgow City Assessor v Monti Marino (Glasgow) Ltd; Willaims (VO) v Scottish and Newcastle Retail Ltd and Anor; Fir Mill Ltd v Royston Urban District Council and Jones (VO)
Hearing
9 October 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Newcastle City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.