110, OLD BROMPTON ROAD, SW7 3RA
Offices and Premises Decided 28 October 2024 CHG100827846 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable values of split and merged assessments at 110 Old Brompton Road, contending they were excessive and proposing a uniform rate of £400 per m² based on comparable rental evidence. The tribunal examined rental transactions and assessed comparables in the locality, particularly 34 Sumner Place (also a Grade 2 listed building). After allowing late evidence showing 34 Sumner Place was Grade 2 listed and therefore comparable, the tribunal determined a uniform unadjusted rate of £425 per m² was reasonable, allowing the appeals in part as this was higher than the appellant sought but lower than the original valuations.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was SRO Motorsports Europe Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 7 October 2024
Similar decisions
- 4TH FLR 1, BREAKERS PLACE, W11 4EX — Allowed in part, 11 Mar 2026
- 45, HARRINGTON GARDENS, SW7 4JU — Allowed in part, 29 Sept 2025
- BST & PT GRD FLR 1 NICHOLAS ROAD, W11 4AN — Dismissed, 16 May 2025
- UNIT 301 GRAND UNION STUDIOS, 332 LADBROKE GROVE, W10 5AD — Allowed in part, 8 Jan 2025
All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.