Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

211 Camden High Street, NW1 7BT

Ground floor shop and premises Decided 10 June 2024 CHG100841900 Simon Tivey Rating

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£382,500£635/m²
Ratepayer sought£257,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£257,500£425/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the valuation was unreasonable, citing an unusually large uplift (58%) compared to other similar properties in the area, and relying on the methodology from a previous Valuation Tribunal decision for the 2010 Rating List. The Valuation Officer contended the location was a prime tourist destination near the underground station supporting a higher valuation. The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the previous tribunal's method of using 115-119 Camden High Street as a comparable with a 1.6 uplift factor, increased by 6% to account for 2010-2017 list movements, was appropriate in the absence of suitable rental and comparable evidence, resulting in a confirmed value of £257,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was URBN UK Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
20 May 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.