211 Camden High Street, NW1 7BT
Ground floor shop and premises Decided 10 June 2024 CHG100841900 Simon Tivey Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the valuation was unreasonable, citing an unusually large uplift (58%) compared to other similar properties in the area, and relying on the methodology from a previous Valuation Tribunal decision for the 2010 Rating List. The Valuation Officer contended the location was a prime tourist destination near the underground station supporting a higher valuation. The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the previous tribunal's method of using 115-119 Camden High Street as a comparable with a 1.6 uplift factor, increased by 6% to account for 2010-2017 list movements, was appropriate in the absence of suitable rental and comparable evidence, resulting in a confirmed value of £257,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was URBN UK Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Valuation method
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 20 May 2024
Similar decisions
- BST & GRD FLR 243, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- BST & GND F(S) 247, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- Inc Pt Bst 18 Bst & Gnd F 16, High Holborn, WC1V 6BR — Allowed in part, 1 Oct 2025
- 8 Pratt Mews, NW1 0AD — Allowed in part, 25 Sept 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.