Tribunals · Leicester City Council · 2017 rating list

Oliver Rayns Ltd, 106 Queens Road, LE2 3FL

Shop and Premises Decided 5 March 2024 CHG100867828 FHP - Ian Mitchell

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£16,750£235/m²
Ratepayer sought£11,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£15,250£100/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that the appeal property should be valued as an office rather than a shop, citing its actual mode of occupation following conversion from restaurant use in 2021. The tribunal found the property's classification should reflect its actual use at the material day (1 September 2021), not the landlord's economic assumptions about retail potential, and agreed it should be valued as an office based on comparable office properties rather than retail zoning methods.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Oliver Rayns Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams (VO) RA-480-[1993] (LT); Williams (VO) v Scottish & Newcastle Retail Ltd and another [2001] EWCA Civ 85; Lotus and Delta v Culverwell (VO) and Leicester City Council [1976] RA 141
Hearing
7 February 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Leicester City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.