Tribunals · London Borough of Merton · 2017 rating list

Unit 1 Priory Retail Park, 131 High Street, SW19 2PP

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 3 July 2024 CHG100884931 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£580,000£300/m²
Ratepayer sought£434,000
VO conceded first£482,500−17% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£482,500£240/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction of the rateable value from £482,500 to £434,000 (£207.50/m2), arguing that the subject property's actual lease rent at £460,000 (£207.84/m2) demonstrated the existing valuation at £240/m2 was unreasonable. The tribunal found that whilst the lease rent was the starting point under Lotus and Delta, it required adjustment for inducements and subsidies and was not a "clean" rent. The tribunal placed weight on comparable properties including Unit 1 Plough Lane valued at £230/m2 and DFS Furniture at Shannon Corner valued at £235/m2, and found an established tone of value for this type of property. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the existing valuation of £482,500 was not unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Dunelm (Soft Furnishings) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
19 June 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Merton · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.