Tribunals · South Kesteven District Council · 2017 rating list

Kyoto Futons Ltd, Hards Lane, PE6 8RP

Factory and premises Decided 16 May 2024 CHG100896703 Rabbette Chartered Surveyors

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£162,000
Ratepayer sought£110,000
VO conceded first£110,000−32% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£110,000

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a 5% layout allowance to be applied to the whole assessment and an additional 5% mixed age allowance for the differing construction styles and maintenance requirements of buildings constructed between 1965-1994. The tribunal found the layout allowance should be applied across the whole assessment but dismissed the mixed age allowance claim, noting that comparable properties in the locality with similar mixed-age characteristics had no such allowance and that the age differences had already been accounted for in the individual building assessments. The RV remained at £110,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Kyoto Futons Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Robinson Brothers (Brewers) Limited v. Chester-Le-Street [1937]; The Occupier v Stauder (VO); Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
1 May 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in South Kesteven District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.