Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Peterborough City Council · 2017 rating list

Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, PE1 1QL

Cafe and premises Decided 5 December 2024 CHG100929630 Tanner Rose

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£65,500
Ratepayer sought£60,250
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£65,500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 4 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL). Every property is listed below.

The 4 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pumpkin Cafe, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QL£95,500£86,000£95,500Dismissed
Pumpkin between Platform 4 and 5, Station Road, Peterborough, PE1 1QLThis appeal£65,500£60,250£65,500Dismissed
WHSmith, Ticket Hall at Peterborough Station, Peterborough PE1 1QL£64,500£59,000£64,500Dismissed
Unit 1A, Norwich Railway Station, Norwich, NR1 1EG£77,500£72,500£77,500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable values should be reduced to reflect only the minimum guaranteed rent (MGR) in the leases, excluding profit-based top-ups. The tribunal found that a prospective tenant would factor the top-up element into any rental bid, and that actual rents paid around the antecedent valuation date (excluding one property) exceeded the MGR, indicating the full passing rent was more analogous to statutory rateable value. The appeals were dismissed as the appellant failed to persuade the tribunal that the confirmed values were unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Select Service Partner Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
11 November 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Peterborough City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.