Tribunals · Chelmsford City Council · 2017 rating list

86-87 Duke Street, CM1 1JP

Shop and premises Decided 19 August 2025 CHG100949943

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 31 May 2022

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant company sought deletion of the property from the 2017 rating list as of 31 May 2022, arguing it was in poor repair (structurally unsafe, requiring major works including full rewire, roof repairs, asbestos removal) following two years of vacancy and would be uneconomical to repair. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that whilst the property was in poor repair, it remained a hereditament capable of beneficial occupation on the basis of reasonable repair assumption (excluding uneconomic repairs), and that a hypothetical landlord would undertake the necessary works to let it, rather than its intended residential conversion.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was PC Partnership (South East) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • State of repair or deletion
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Newbigin (VO) v Monk; Jackson (VO) v Canary Wharf Ltd
Hearing
31 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Chelmsford City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.