Tribunals · South Hams District Council · 2017 rating list

HEMERDON MINE, HEMERDON, PL7 5BU

Tungsten mine and premises Decided 1 May 2025 CHG101054030 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA/Newmark Gerald Eve LLP

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—from 17 Jul 2019

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant company argued that the mine became incapable of beneficial occupation due to disconnection of electricity supply on 17 July 2019, absence of operating licences, and redundant plant requiring site redesign. The tribunal found that while licensing and plant redesign were not disabling factors, the extended absence of adequate electrical power (disconnected July 2019, reconnected March 2021 at only 2.5MVA versus 12MVA previously available, with 6.5MVA not reached until December 2022) rendered the property incapable of beneficial occupation. The tribunal allowed the deletion for the period 17 July 2019 to 30 November 2022, dismissing the other appeals which had different material dates.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Tungsten West Plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Humber Ltd v Jones (VO); Hall v Edwards (VO); Kier Hardman (VO) v British Gas Trading
Hearing
16 April 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in South Hams District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.