Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

1 ST FL, 55, ST JAMES'S STREET, SW1A 1LA

Office and Premises Decided 3 February 2025 CHG101055838 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£695,000£1100/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£695,000£1100/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 7 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values on seven office units at 55 St James Street, arguing the unadjusted rate should be reduced from £1,100/m² to £1,000/m². The tribunal applied the six propositions from Lotus & Delta v Culverwell, finding the rental evidence for the subject building—particularly leases agreed close to the antecedent valuation date (1st Fl at £1,051.05/m² and 4th Fl at £1,146.55/m²)—supported the current rate of £1,100/m². The tribunal concluded the subject was a unique, newly built Grade A office building with superior specification that commanded premium rents, distinguishing it from older comparable properties on St James Street, and dismissed the appeal.", <parameter name="mcc_type">null

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was AlbaCore Capital LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
10 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.