Benfield Ford, Newcastle Road, SR5 1JS
Car showroom and premises Decided 12 May 2025 CHG101058751 Knight Frank - Joanne Corney
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £297,500 to £202,000 to reflect reduction in tone and an end allowance for access through an adjacent site. The parties agreed on the tone adjustment but disputed the access allowance (appellant sought 15%, VO offered 7.5%). The tribunal found the subject property's access was more of a disadvantage than many comparable sites, but not as severe as the only comparable with a 15% allowance (which involved multiple quality issues). The tribunal determined a 12.5% allowance was reasonable and set the RV at £207,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Lookers PLC, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Change of circumstances
- Change of circumstances
- access constraints
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobold LLP v Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
- Hearing
- 15 April 2025
Similar decisions
- Kia Motors, Castle View, Castletown, SR5 3DR — Dismissed, 28 Feb 2025
- Dulux Decorator Centre, 1A Hylton Grange, SR5 3HR — Dismissed, 20 Nov 2024
- Former Colin Noble & Sons, 6 Holmeside, SR1 3JG — Dismissed, 23 Jun 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.