Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

PT 2ND FL 2A (EXCL EAST WING) BLUE FIN BUILDING, 110, SOUTHWARK STREET, SE1 0SU

Offices and premises Decided 14 July 2025 CHG101082625 Ryan

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£352,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£333,000from 13 Jan 2020

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (PT 2 FL 2A (EXCL EAST WING) BLUE FIN BUILDING, 110 SOUTHWARK STREET, LONDON SE1 0SU). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
PT 2 FL 2A (EXCL EAST WING) BLUE FIN BUILDING, 110 SOUTHWARK STREET, LONDON SE1 0SUThis appeal£352,500—£333,000Allowed
PT 7 FLR (SOUTH), BLUE FIN BUILDING, 110 SOUTHWARK STREET, LONDON SE1 0SU£660,000—£620,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants challenged the rateable values of two office floors (second and seventh) at the Blue Fin Building, Southwark, contending that the tone per m² should be reduced from £490/m² to £460/m². The tribunal accepted that whilst some quantum effect may apply to larger offices, the evidence from comparable rents in the building did not clearly support the VO's valuation approach. The tribunal found that £460/m² was reasonable when compared to valuations of equivalent office space in the newer adjacent 240 Blackfriars Road building, adjusted downward to reflect the Blue Fin Building's older age.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mediaocean Systems Ltd and Crown Agents Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner and Theobold LLP v Jackson
Hearing
16 June 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.