Kia Motors, Fortune Close, NN3 9HZ
Car showroom and premises Decided 11 October 2024 CHG101087313 Rabbette Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of £90,000 at the subject property, proposing a reduction to £56,000 based on a lower main space rate of £90/m² instead of the assessed £145/m². The tribunal applied the principles from Lotus and Delta v Culverwell and found that the comparable evidence presented by the Valuation Officer—three purpose-built car showrooms in similar locations with the same £145/m² rate—demonstrated an established market tone. The tribunal rejected the appellant's comparables (a converted industrial unit at a different location and a premium flagship showroom of significantly larger size) as unreliable indicators and dismissed the appeal, confirming the RV at £90,000 with effect from 1 April 2017.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Spirit Motor Holdings Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 12 September 2024
Similar decisions
- Sytner Land Rover, Tesla, NN3 9HX — Dismissed, 5 Feb 2026
- Poundstretcher, 34 Gold Street, NN1 1RS — Allowed, 1 Jul 2024
- O2, 12 Abington Street, NN1 2AJ — Allowed, 1 Jul 2024
- O2, Unit 45, NN3 8JZ — Allowed, 1 Jul 2024
All decisions in West Northamptonshire Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.