Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

Management Suite Level 24 The Shard 31, St Thomas Street, SE1 9RY

Decided 1 April 2025 CHG101088186 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£8,800£550/m²
Ratepayer sought£500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,300£550/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 50 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a serviced office provider, challenged the rateable values of 50 serviced office suites on Levels 24 and 25 of The Shard, seeking a reduction from £550/m² to £500/m². The tribunal found the base price of £550/m² was reasonable based on comparable rental evidence, particularly a new letting at Rear Part Level 2 agreed on the antecedent valuation date (1 April 2015) which analysed to £604/m² after adjustments. The tribunal applied the Bunyan v Acenden principles for amortising rent-free periods over the full lease term (absent a break clause). The tribunal rejected the appellant's argument for removing the 'Tower uplift' for south-facing suites lacking Thames views, finding no persuasive evidence of reduced desirability. The tribunal allowed 48 appeals in part by granting a 5% material change of circumstances allowance from 1 April 2017 to 31 January 2022 (for all properties except Suites 2511 and 2512 which already had this allowance), and dismissed 2 appeals relating to those two suites.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Office Group Holdings Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
construction works - Fielden House demolition and reconstruction
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Measurement survey, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited; Specialeyes Plc v Felgate
Hearing
5 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.