Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

Suite 2506 Level 25 The Shard 31, St Thomas Street, SE1 9RY

Serviced office suites Decided 1 April 2025 CHG101088285 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeMixed
Original RV£8,800£550/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,370£550/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 50 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a serviced office provider, challenged the rateable values of 50 office suites at The Shard on Levels 24 and 25, arguing for a reduction from £550/m² to £500/m² and contending that a 'Tower uplift' should not apply to 17 south-facing suites lacking Thames views. The appellant also sought a 5% material change of circumstances allowance for disruption from adjacent building demolition and reconstruction (1 April 2017 to 31 January 2022). The tribunal, guided by Bunyan v Acenden on rent amortisation principles, found the £550/m² base reasonable and rejected the uplift removal due to lack of evidence of diminished desirability. The tribunal allowed 48 appeals in part, granting the 5% MCC allowance conceded by the Valuation Officer for the specified period; two appeals (Suites 2511 and 2512, which had already received the 5% allowance) were dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Office Group Holdings Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
demolition and reconstruction of adjacent building (Fielden House)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited; Specialeyes Plc v Felgate
Hearing
5 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.