Tribunals · Durham County Council · 2017 rating list

WM Smith & Sons (Barnard Castle) Ltd, Stainton Grove, Barnard Castle, Barnard Castle, DL12 8UH

Warehouse and premises Decided 20 September 2024 CHG101088359 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£49,750
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£49,500£32.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of £49,750 as unreasonable, arguing for a lower main space rate (£30/m2 instead of £32.50/m2), contending that the external display building should be valued at one-third the main rate, and that the office uplift should be reduced from 20% to 15%. The tribunal found the current main space rate of £32.50/m2 was reasonable based on comparable evidence, but agreed that the external display building—used purely for historical display—should be valued at half the main space rate (£16.25/m2). The tribunal reduced the assessment to £49,500 RV, allowing the appeal in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was WM Smith & Sons (Barnard Castle) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Zoning or layout
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
22 August 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Durham County Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.