Tribunals · London Borough of Southwark · 2017 rating list

Suite 2412 Level 24 The Shard 31, St Thomas Street, SE1 9RY

Serviced offices Decided 1 April 2025 CHG101088931 Avison Young (UK) Ltd

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£8,800£550/m²
Ratepayer sought£500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£8,300£550/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 50 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a 5% reduction based on rental evidence analysis at £500/m2 tone and removal of the tower uplift from south-facing suites. The tribunal found the original £550/m2 tone reasonable and rejected the tower uplift argument, but accepted the valuation officer's concession of a 5% material change of circumstances allowance for 1 April 2017 to 31 January 2022 (except for two suites already benefited). The tribunal was guided by Acenden principles on rent devaluation and found the appellant's analysis unreliable with significant variations.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Office Group Holdings Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
demolition and reconstruction of Fielden House
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited; Specialeyes Plc v Felgate
Hearing
5 March 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Southwark · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.