The Courtyard, 94 Church Road, Tarleton, Tarleton, PR4 6UP
Showroom and premises Decided 26 April 2024 CHG101091965 Ken Batty Chartered Surveyors - Sara
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction from £37,000 to £32,250 RV, arguing that an end allowance of 15% should be applied to reflect major disabilities throughout the showroom unit. The tribunal found that the appellant had failed to discharge the evidential burden of proof. Although a rent of £39,000 had been agreed in 2013 (two years before the antecedent valuation date), and the tribunal accepted that the VO's base rate of £36.00/m2 already reflected the property's disabilities, the appellant provided insufficient supporting evidence including no photographic evidence and only a hand-drawn, unscaled plan, and no comparable evidence of similar properties with such allowances.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ena Mill Tarleton Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Quantum or end allowance · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 3 April 2024
Similar decisions
- Ena Mill Ltd, The Courtyard, 94 Church Road, Tarleton, 94 Church Road, Tarleton, PR4 6UP — Dismissed, 26 Apr 2024
- Geoffrey And Joy, Units 5 And 6, PR4 6UP — Allowed in part, 19 Nov 2021
All decisions in West Lancashire Borough Council · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.