151 -153, CAMDEN HIGH STREET, NW1 7JR
Retail unit Decided 10 September 2025 CHG101097092 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant sought a reduction in the price per m² from £2,000 to £1,500, arguing that the valuation breakpoint should be at Underhill Passage rather than Pleasant Row. The tribunal found that comparable properties neighbouring the subject property (Pret a Manger and 157 Camden High Street) were valued at £2,000 per m² and were located in the same parade after Underhill Passage, which it considered compelling evidence. The tribunal concluded that footfall would continue past Underhill Passage to Marks and Spencer's Foodhall before reducing, so the subject property should retain the higher tone of £2,000 per m².
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Breese (Fitness 2020) Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 5 September 2025
Similar decisions
- BST & GND F(S) 247, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- BST & GRD FLR 243, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- Inc Pt Bst 18 Bst & Gnd F 16, High Holborn, WC1V 6BR — Allowed in part, 1 Oct 2025
- 8 Pratt Mews, NW1 0AD — Allowed in part, 25 Sept 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.