Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

151 -153, CAMDEN HIGH STREET, NW1 7JR

Retail unit Decided 10 September 2025 CHG101097092 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£150,000£2000/m²
Ratepayer sought£113,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£150,000£2000/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in the price per m² from £2,000 to £1,500, arguing that the valuation breakpoint should be at Underhill Passage rather than Pleasant Row. The tribunal found that comparable properties neighbouring the subject property (Pret a Manger and 157 Camden High Street) were valued at £2,000 per m² and were located in the same parade after Underhill Passage, which it considered compelling evidence. The tribunal concluded that footfall would continue past Underhill Passage to Marks and Spencer's Foodhall before reducing, so the subject property should retain the higher tone of £2,000 per m².

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Breese (Fitness 2020) Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Settled assessments
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
5 September 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.