Tribunals · Mansfield District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 3 QUEENS COURT FLETCHERS WAY, FLETCHERS WAY, FOREST TOWN, FOREST TOWN, NG19 0FN

Workshop and premises Decided 27 January 2025 CHG101102385 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£44,750£47.26/m²
Ratepayer sought£40,750
VO conceded first£44,500−1% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£44,500£48/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction to £40,750 (£44 per m²) based on the passing rent from May 2020 analysed at £44.10 per m². The Valuation Officer had reduced the RV to £44,500 (£48 per m²) due to removal of a mezzanine floor. The tribunal, considering rental evidence from neighbouring properties (Unit 2 Queens Court and Unit 4A Hamilton Way) which analysed to between £55.45-£63.58 per m², found that £48 per m² was not unreasonable and confirmed the Valuation Officer's revised valuation of £44,500 with effect from 1 April 2023, allowing the appeal in part due to the change in agreed floor areas.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Schoolblazer Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Change of circumstances
Change of circumstances
mezzanine floor removal
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
10 January 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Mansfield District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.