264, BROMPTON ROAD, SW3 2AS
Restaurant and premises Decided 15 July 2024 CHG101104910 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a restaurant operator, challenged the rateable value of £422,500 based on a tone of value of £615 per m2, claiming the property's unique character and poor access warranted a lower valuation. The tribunal found the appellant's rental evidence was remote from the antecedent valuation date and the lease details were incompletely documented, while accepting the respondent's comparable evidence from similar restaurants nearby supported a tone of £1,150 per m2 with a 30% allowance for access and location factors.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Restaurant 264 Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 26 June 2024
Similar decisions
- Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, SW7 5BD — Allowed, 3 Mar 2026
- Caraffini, 61-63 Lower Sloane Street, SW1W 8DH — Dismissed, 7 Jul 2025
- Bst - Gnd Flrs 282-292 Westbourne Grove, W11 2PS — Dismissed, 1 Mar 2024
- 343 Kensington High Street, W8 6NW — Dismissed, 29 Sept 2023
All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.