Tribunals · Northumberland County Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 1, West End, Morpeth Road, NE63 8QG

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 27 June 2025 CHG101106145 Bell & Bell

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£61,000£70/m²
Ratepayer sought£55,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£56,500£65/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that the subject property's main space price of £70/m² was excessive and sought £63.75/m² based on consistent differentials between it and comparable The Factory Shop that had persisted through previous rating lists. The Valuation Officer maintained that £70/m² was fair based on fresh rental evidence from comparables, arguing each revaluation was separate and distinct. The Tribunal found merit in the differentials approach supported by case law, found the Cramlington comparables too distant to be helpful, and determined £65/m² was reasonable having regard to differences in age, size and location, reducing the RV from £61,000 to £56,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Maxwells (Sunderland) Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell; Lamb v Minards; Barnard and Barnard v Walker
Hearing
28 May 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Northumberland County Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.