Parking Space, 10 Wimpole Court, PO1 1QT
Car parking space and premises Decided 1 October 2024 CHG101110664 Wilks Head & Eve LLP - James Lewin
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 2 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
Portsmouth City Council sought deletion of two car parking spaces from the 2017 rating list on the grounds that they were domestic property forming part of the curtilage of residential flats. The tribunal found that the parking spaces were not appurtenances to the residential flats because they could be licensed to any individual, including non-local residents, with no automatic right for flat residents to obtain a space. Consequently, the tribunal determined the spaces were correctly classified as non-domestic hereditaments and the appeals were dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the billing authority, represented.
Grounds argued
- Relief or exemption
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Laing v Kingswood Assessment Committee; Garton v Hunter; Lotus and Delta Limited v Culverwell; Reeves v Tobias; Coxhead v Brentwood UDC; Porter VO v Gray Son & Cook and Cambridge Corporation; Woolway v Mazars; Cardtronics and Others v Sykes and Others; LB Southwark v Ludgate House Ltd
- Hearing
- 13 September 2024
Similar decisions
- Parking Space, 7 Union Place, PO1 1QZ — Dismissed, 1 Oct 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.