Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Portsmouth City Council · 2017 rating list

Parking Space, 7 Union Place, PO1 1QZ

Car parking space and premises Decided 1 October 2024 CHG101112729 Wilks Head & Eve

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£500from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Parking Space, 7 Union Place, Portsmouth PO1 1QZ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Parking Space, 7 Union Place, Portsmouth PO1 1QZThis appeal£500—£500Dismissed
Parking Space, 10 Wimpole Court, Portsmouth PO1 1QT£500—£500Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Portsmouth City Council sought deletion of two parking space assessments from the rating list, arguing they were domestic property forming part of the curtilage of residential flats. The tribunal rejected this argument, finding that the parking spaces were not appurtenances to the residential properties because they could be licensed to anyone (including non-residents living outside a 15-minute walk) with no automatic right to residents of the flats, and the council had deliberately separated the parking from the flats. The spaces were correctly treated as non-domestic hereditaments.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Portsmouth City Council, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Relief or exemption
Evidence
Expert report
Cases cited
Laing v Kingswood Assessment Committee; Garton v Hunter; Lotus and Delta Limited v Culverwell; Reeves v Tobias; Coxhead v Brentwood UDC; Porter VO v Gray Son & Cook and Cambridge Corporation; Woolway v Mazars; Cardtronics and Others v Sykes and Others; LB Southwark v Ludgate House Ltd
Hearing
13 September 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Portsmouth City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.