Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 35 AND UNIT 37, LANGTHWAITE GRANGE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, SOUTH KIRKBY, WF9 3NR

Warehouse and premises; Workshop and premises Decided 26 November 2025 CHG101111037 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£65,500
Ratepayer sought£48,500
VO conceded first£55,000−16% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£55,000

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 35 and Unit 37, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Unit 35 and Unit 37, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NRThis appeal£65,500£48,500£55,000Dismissed
Unit 28, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£111,000£101,000£112,000Allowed in part
Unit 28A, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£46,000£32,500£40,000Dismissed
Unit 34D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£71,000£45,750£53,000Dismissed
Unit 19C & D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3AP£37,750£25,000£28,750Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued for reductions in rateable values based on lower price per m² for industrial units on Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, relying on rental evidence from the same estate and comparable properties. The Tribunal found the Valuation Officer's evidence, particularly from Unit 2 Power Park (a comparable size unit on a similar rural industrial estate with rent agreed close to the valuation date), more persuasive. The rents relied upon by the appellants were considered too remote from the April 2021 valuation date to be reliable. For Units 35 and 37 and Unit 34D, the appeals were dismissed without change; for Units 28A and 19C&D, the appeals were dismissed but the Tribunal accepted the VO's revised valuations with effect from the decision date.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ernest Cooper Limited / Askern UK Limited / Karonia Limited / MX 5 City Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
12 November 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.