Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 19 C&D, LANGTHWAITE GRANGE IND EST, SOUTH KIRKBY, WF9 3AP

Warehouse and premises Decided 26 November 2025 CHG101120643 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2023 list£37,750
Ratepayer sought£25,000
VO conceded first£28,750−24% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£28,750from 26 Nov 2025

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2023 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 5 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Unit 19C & D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3AP). Every property is listed below.

The 5 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2023 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Unit 35 and Unit 37, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£65,500£48,500£55,000Dismissed
Unit 28, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£111,000£101,000£112,000Allowed in part
Unit 28A, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£46,000£32,500£40,000Dismissed
Unit 34D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3NR£71,000£45,750£53,000Dismissed
Unit 19C & D, Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate, South Kirkby, Pontefract, WF9 3APThis appeal£37,750£25,000£28,750Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants argued that the tone of the 2023 rating list valuations for five industrial units on Langthwaite Grange Industrial Estate was excessive and should be reduced. They relied on rental evidence from the estate itself, particularly a lease from 2019, and argued for lower price per m2 rates. The Tribunal found the Valuation Officer's evidence more persuasive, particularly comparable evidence from Unit 2 Power Park close to the material day, and considered the rents relied on by the appellants to be too remote from the material valuation date. The appeals were dismissed for Units 35 and 37 and Unit 34D; for other units, the Tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's revised valuations but with increases taking effect from the decision date.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ernest Cooper Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Hearing
12 November 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.